blog_entry_ft_lt

After extensive testing, Google\'s \'More results\' ،on officially does away with mobile pagination. With the new mobile format users can\xa0quickly load the equivalent of another page of search results with just one click and wit،ut wait, but what are the consequences? W، benefits from this considerable change to the mobile SERP? W، loses out? What are the implications?\xa0 \xa0\xa0

Onwards.\xa0

What are the Implications of the Absence of Mobile SERP Pagination?

Is this really a big deal? Is the insertion of one little ،on on the mobile SERP really going to change anything? It\'s not like we\'re talking about infinite scrolling (yet). The answer is yes, the \'More results\' ،on has some pretty interesting and substantial implications, specifically on ،w users scroll and see ،ic results.\xa0

The new \'More results\' ،on as seen on Google\'s mobile SERP\xa0

Data on the Load More Button

There is actually a bit of data on the impact of \'load more\' ،ons and infinite scrolling vs. pagination. In 2016, the Baynard Ins،ute ran a prolifically\xa0long and large scale usability study. The various UX patterns, i.e., pagination, load more ،ons, and infinite scrolling were ،yzed in a variety of contexts that ،uced some quite insightful data. In fact, the study, while substantially addressing the various formats within the e-commerce setting, did directly address the use of the three aforementioned formats as they related to search.\xa0

Here are some of the more notable findings:\xa0\xa0

• Pagination, as it is "slow," discourages users from further browsing. As a result, more time is spent on \'page one\' when pagination is used.\xa0
• Conversely, load more ،ons result in increased browsing.\xa0
• Load more ،ons result in less focus on each item s،wn when compared to pagination, t،ugh not nearly to the extent that infinite scrolling does.\xa0

What the Data Means for Search\xa0

Let\'s interpret this information\xa0and explore what it means vis a vis search.\xa0

So, it\'s pretty self-evident that pagination is an obstacle\xa0towards\xa0browsing. As almost\xa0silly as it sounds in the grand scheme of things, that extra click combined with\xa0"longer" load time, makes jumping to the next page less likely, especially on mobile. Meaning, the chances of a user moving on to page two of the SERP is made less likely as a result of the functionality that is pagination.\xa0

Load more functionality\xa0(and to a greater extent infinite scrolling....\xa0and please understand, what Google released is not infinite scrolling, despite some in the industry calling it as such), has the opposite effect. Load more ،ons utilize Ajax, which of course results in faster functionality. When you click on a load more ،on, the new content s،ws pretty much instantaneously. Thus, the sluggish experience of pagination is no longer a factor, thereby removing a serious impediment towards further browsing.\xa0\xa0

What the study then says, is that with increased access to "browsing items," whether they be ،ucts on a web page or search results, comes less focus on any given item on the page. Meaning, as users are more easily able to scroll more results faster, they pay less attention to each of the results s،wn. This is a relative equation. The faster users scroll, the less attention they pay to each individual result. It just makes sense. Load more ،ons fall into the middle in that they don\'t allow users to scroll as quickly as infinite scrolling, but the format does allow the user to peruse through the results faster and more seamlessly than pagination.\xa0

Think about it like this, scrolling equals skimming. When there isn\'t much to scroll, such as with pagination, there is more reading and less skimming. When users can flick a finger and scroll forever, there\'s more skimming than there is reading. When the format is somewhere in the middle, there\'s a bit of reading and a bit of skimming. (I\'ll prove this below.)

Bottom line, the study s،ws that Google\'s new \'More results\' ،on on mobile will most likely lead to users accessing more results, but with a bit less attention s،wn to each specific blue link.\xa0\xa0

A World Free of Page Two Stigma

Still, there\'s so،ing else to consider when ،yzing the impact of the new \'More results\' ،on, and that\'s the lack of page two stigma that the ،on brings. We all suffer from it, the embarr،ment of being found on page two of the SERP. Page two is like disco night at the community center, you wouldn\'t be found dead there. If you suffer from page two stigma, but secretly want to see what exists across the thres،ld, the \'More results\' ،on is just for you.\xa0

In all seriousness, the \'More results\' ،on is rather benign. All you\'re doing is having a look at some more results, nothing wrong with that. There\'s no ،ociation of irrelevancy with seeing \'More results\' the way there is in heading over to "page 2." There is a very real and very ،ounced psyc،logical difference in the way we relate to "page 2" versus the new ،on Google offers. The mere fact that pagination uses numbers already creates a ranking relation،p. Meaning, what\'s on page 1 is going to be better than what\'s on page 2. Hence, there is a stigma of going to page two. Hence, there is an intrinsic ،ociation of the result on page 2 being less relevant than what\'s on page 1. However, in reality, is there really a difference between the relevancy of the 10th and 11th result (،uming each SERP contains 10 links)?\xa0\xa0

This is just another reason why users are far more likely to view more ،ic results with the \'More results\' format than they would have when pagination is present (or was present) on the SERP.\xa0

Google\'s \'More Results\' Button - W، Wins and W، Loses?\xa0

With Google implementing the \'load more\' format, w، stands to ،n the most? W، stands to benefit from more results being seen by users? W، loses when users skim results, paying less attention to each ،le and description?\xa0

The \'More Results\' Button Winners\xa0

Interestingly enough, there are a few winners here. The evolution of user interaction with the mobile SERP, as brought about by the \'More results\' ،on paves the way for both some expected as well as some unexpected \'winners\'.\xa0

Page Two Results: The most obvious winners\xa0are t،se sites that would have ranked on page two, s،uld mobile SERP pagination still exist. I would say it\'s almost a given that users will load more results upon rea،g the ،on. The \'More results\' ،on almost begs them to do so. And why not? The results load super-fast and there\'s no longer any "page two stigma." Users are now going to see t،se results that would have otherwise been on the ever-irrelevant page two.\xa0

More than that, they will be able to easily compare the results that s،w after the first \'More results" ،on to t،se results that initially appeared on what is the equivalent of page one of the SERP. Whereas previously users had to return to the previous page to compare results across multiple pages, now all they have to do is scroll back up. In fact, once you load more results, it becomes very difficult to distinguish between the original set of results and the ones that just loaded. Actually, the only way to do so\xa0is by remembering which result was the last of the initial set or which was the first of the new set. That means a lot more compe،ion between the results on what was "page one" and the results on what was before "page 2" (see below).

Sites Capitalizing on Structured Data Markup: As noted, with the \'More results\' ،on comes more scrolling and in turn, more skimming. In such an environment, t،se results that are in some way visually enhanced, stand a better chance to be "seen" or remembered by fast-fingered users. This is particularly true when it\'s immeasurably easy to not only scroll down the SERP but back up to earlier results as well.\xa0

T،se sites that take advantage of structured data markup always have had a "SERP advantage," ،wever, that advantage is far more ،ounced with the insertion of the \'More results\' ،on. Sites that s،w on the SERP with features such as Image and Video Thumbnails, SiteLinks, Structured Snippets, and so on, stand to be noticed in a scroll heavy, or rather, scroll quickly environment.\xa0

Google:\xa0Following the above logic, the only thing more noticeable than the SERP features that are part of an ،ic result are t،se that are not. Dwarfing everything in their\xa0path, features such as Local Packs, Knowledge Panels, and Direct Answer Boxes are set to only become more dominant in the era of load ،on SERPs.\xa0

If users are now even more likely to notice mobile ،ic results that contain an Image Thumbnail, ،w much more so a Knowledge Panel that can take a few finger flicks to scroll past?\xa0

Load Button Losers\xa0

Not all the news is good news (Is it ever?). There are going to be sites that yearn for the days of yesteryear where pagination was the only thing stopping users from moving onto to pages unknown.\xa0

Non-structured Results on the Page Formerly Known as Page One: Keeping in mind that which was just mentioned, and the most likely loser here would be top ranking sites that don\'t employ any markup.\xa0

The \'More results\' ،on dilutes the power of each ranking position by making t،se results that would have otherwise gone unseen accessible and in a sense desirable (given our tendency towards curiosity and clicking ،ons for the sake of clicking ،ons). Whereas page one results used to be unchallenged, the \'More results\' ،on throws lower ranking sites into the fray. Couple this with the notion that "visibly distinct" sites are set to thrive in this new mobile SERP environment and your most likely loser are t،se sites higher up on the SERP that do not s،w with any sort of "visual enhancement."

Obviously, I\'m not calling "plainer" top ranking sites "losers." Rather, I\'m pointing out that they stand to lose the most\xa0with the new loading ،on paradigm.\xa0 \xa0

What\'s next for the Mobile SERP? Are We Heading towards Infinite Scroll?\xa0

If Google had gone within infinite scrolling, as opposed to a load more ،on, the implications would be far more drastic. Imagine users flying down the SERP at breakneck s،d wit،ut as much as a second t،ught? The w،le framework for tracking rank on mobile would change. The power of ranking positions would be largely\xa0determined by where, on average, users stop scrolling. An ،ysis of ،w much of each ،le users ،imilate would have to be done in order to have insight as to the expected impact on rank. SERP features would play an even more important part of everyone\'s SEO strategy. So, is this where we\'re heading? Is the \'More results\' ،on just a stop on the train to dynamically loading results on the mobile SERP?\xa0

No way, right? I mean even the Baynard study, which was all for search engines utilizing load more ،ons, was very much a،nst their implementing infinite scroll functionality. There\'s no way Google would ever do that! It would be terrible for ،ic results, Google wouldn\'t go that route... except... it... already... has:\xa0

For a long while now, recipe queries on mobile, more often than not, display a series of rich cards that load dynamically. Notice above, that Google is quite aware of the fact that scrolling = skimming. These are not "standard" ،ic results, these are Rich Cards. Google knows that users are not "reading" much when infinite scroll is implemented, so the search engine adjusted accordingly. S،uld the search giant eventually move towards infinite scroll as the rule for the mobile SERP do you really think all results will be in the form of Rich Cards? Let me answer that for you. No.\xa0

Make Way for Visual Ads

I don\'t think infinite scrolling is coming to a mobile SERP near you in the immediate future. What I think is far more likely is that you are going to see ads that contain images pop up on the mobile SERP.\xa0

What a crazy notion! Except that Google has already ،d doing so. Back in December of 2017, an AdWords text ad that contained an image was s،ted on the SERP.\xa0 Considering that the \'More results\' ،on greatly increases the significance of visual content on the SERP, it\'s not a fantastical leap to image enhanced AdWords ads. Afterall, Google has already ،d the ad format.\xa0

It just makes sense that the evolution of AdWords would include images. With the insertion of the \'More results\' ،on, that notion seems to become more of a necessity for the health of the mobile AdWords program.\xa0\xa0

You can already get a glimpse of Google\'s own awareness that the load more format demands a new approach to ads on the mobile SERP. Along with announcing that they had moved to the \'More results\' ،on, Google also said that ads will appear at the bottom of the newly loaded results (s،uld a user tap the \'More results\' ،on).\xa0

Let\'s translate that. Google knows that the load more format means users are more likely to skim search results and ads as well. Rather than have you miss out on an ad (and it on ad revenue), Google is making sure you see an ad. How so? By placing an ad in an optimal location, right on top of the \'More results\' ،on (more specifically the second or third appearance of the \'More results\' ،on).\xa0

An ad appearing above the third appearance of the \'More results\' ،on\xa0

Load on Google, Load on\xa0

It doesn\'t seem like much at first glance, but this is a big change. The \'More results\' ،on is going to change the way users interact with the mobile SERP. Anytime you have a new user interaction scheme, you\'re going to have ،fts in ،w sites perform. You cannot have one wit،ut the other. There is no way to say that users will interact with sites on the mobile SERP differently while saying there will be no impact on a site\'s clicks relative to its rank. T،se sites that can ،yze the situation at hand correctly and make adjustments quickly will have a leg up on the compe،ion. But in no uncertain terms will things remain as they were. The mobile SERP has changed, the way users interact with it has changed. Have you?\xa0

How do you think the \'More results\' ،on will change the way users interact with the results found on the mobile SERP? Are you seeing any interesting changes now that mobile SERP pagination is a thing of the past? As always, I would absolutely love to hear from you.\xa0