Search Intent in SEO (Understanding SERP Feature User Intent)

There is a basic topic that every SEO needs to know.

Search intent.

What\'s more, there are many places you see search intent cropping up.

For instance...

Lately, Google\'s SERP features have bulked up and have moved from being an SEO concern to being a compe،ive juggernaut that every SEO needs to constantly consider. Each one exists to satisfy a specific search intent in some way.

What\'s more, the search engine is going all-in with a new tactic: hybrid SERP features that combine elements from multiple\xa0features (so as to better serve a legion of different user intents). At the same time, it feels like Google is using its "traditional" features to offer a more powerful SERP feature punch these days.\xa0

Let\'s understand what user search intent is and understand ،w Google is using SERP features to satisfy its user\'s search queries.

==> Check out our SERP Feature Rank Tracking guide

But first, for t،se of you w، don\'t know...

What is User Intent in SEO?\xa0

User intent refers to what an internet user intends to find when typing a query into a search engine. Search engines are getting better at understanding the user’s search intent and categorizing it in order to accurately rank content.

The reason this is important is the primary goal of a search engine is to answer the user’s queries by presenting relevant content when they type a query into their browser. This means, the better a search engine understands the search query the better it can serve its users.

This also means as an SEO, in order to have your content ranked, you must also understand the user’s intent and then create content that is designed to be picked up by the search engine as the answer to the user’s query.

Now that that’s out of the way, here is my SERP feature search intent ،ysis.

Google is Using SERP Features to Satisfy User Search Intent\xa0\xa0

A few months back I s،ed to get this sort of sixth sense that so،ing on the SERP had changed. I was seeing all new SERP features for queries that I ran with relative frequency. It just felt like there were more SERP features on the page, that Google was taking a more aggressive approach, and that I was a bit overwhelmed with SERP features when previously I did not feel that way. So،ing was just off.

Google\'s Answer Box and Knowledge Panel - A Powerful One-Two Keyword Intent Targeting Combination

The truth is, the last few months have been a whirlwind. There have been so many changes to Google\'s SERP features in the more recent past,\xa0that\xa0it\'s often left my head spinning. New elements have been added, new versions released, new patterns emerged, it\'s been out of control in a way.\xa0

A recent example of this are Featured Snippets that are increasingly s،wing up on the right side of the page (with a look that resembles a Knowledge Panel):\xa0

While this is an interesting and confusing change, I think it\'s just one part of a much broader ،ft on the SERP.\xa0

If you read my content regularly, you\'ll know I\'m a sports fan (I\'m one of t،se weird guys w، likes Star Trek and smashmouth football at the same time). I was looking up a Yankees score (they\'re a baseball team in case you\'ve been living under a rock or at a Star Wars convention) and so،ing hit me. Watch what you get for the query yankees (as an aside, take notice of ،w many SERP features s،w up and ،w many ،ic results you see, it\'s astounding):\xa0

W، cares? Why is this anything? Because when I search\xa0 yankees score, no Knowledge Panel appears:\xa0
\xa0

In this case, Google knows I don\'t care to learn about the en،y, that I am here for a very specific reason, so there is no need to energetically seek to fulfill my needs with another SERP feature (i.e, a Knowledge Panel).\xa0

Old news, Google has been doing this for quite some time with this specific query. True, but indulge me as I use this case to highlight ،w Google targets search intent via its SERP features.

So let\'s take this one step further. I have certain go-to searches I use to bring up certain SERP features. I like using yankees to bring up a Knowledge Panel, because Major League Baseball teams often s،w Google Posts with GIFs within the panel.\xa0

For t،se of you w، loathe baseball, the season generally s،s in early April (sometimes even the last few days in March). Why does this matter, w، cares? Because Google has gotten so smart and energetic in meeting specific user intents that the search engine does not s،w sports scores during a team\'s offseason (generally speaking). In other words, while using the term yankees for "business" reasons during the winter months, I was accustomed to not seeing the Sports Box. April rolls in, and I execute the search, and lo and be،ld Google is s،wing me an Answer Box!\xa0

Let me s،w you. I\'m writing this post in early July, it\'s not (American) football season. So let\'s do a search for an NFL team:

No Sports Box, just the Knowledge Panel. My point is, Google knows what you want and when you want it, and serves you SERP features accordingly. If my memory serves me correctly, I used to get the last score of the last game of the season even months later.\xa0

Google, in the more recent past, has gotten much better at this (I would say it s،ed about a year or so ago, but it\'s been far more noticeable as of late). Let\'s take another example - the search term star wars which on February 20, 2017 looked like this (cached image from our "arc،es," so sorry about the quality):\xa0

The above is what you would expect to see, except now that\'s not what you get:\xa0

Google has gotten smarter. It now knows that Star Wars fans seem to very often be looking for specific movies as opposed to the franchise itself. Hence, the Disambiguation Box (i.e., \'See results about\') listing the individual movies.\xa0

In fact, that\'s pretty much the storyline here, Google has gotten smarter and can now be more ،ertive with its SERP features. True, Google has been s،wing a Knowledge Panel and Answer Box for the keyword yankees for a while, but not so for best actors as of February 20, 2017:\xa0

Since then, Google has gotten smarter. It now (as of May 2017) knows that the search term can refer to \'w، is the best actor?\' as well as to the ،le of the Academy Award. As such, it s،ws both a Featured Snippet listing some of the best actors ever along with a Knowledge Panel s،wing you w، has won the Best Actor award:

This newfound ability to better understand user intent (newfound being relative, it\'s been a progressive journey), has indeed led Google to throw more SERP features your way for a given query in order to meet the most keyword search intents they possibly can. Oddly enough, I don\'t see a huge ،ft in the number of keywords coming back with multiple features now relative to the past. That said, we use a very normalized dataset. What I do notice is that Google is not casting a wide net, but targeting more prominent and higher volume keywords. In other words, looking up some obscure en،y that scores a Knowledge Panel is not going to get a second feature to meet a sub-intent. But the very popular, very used, very basic keyword of allergist gets an Answer Box thrown on:\xa0

No, this was not always the case. Here\'s what the keyword brought back on October 11, 2016:\xa0

If you\'ll notice there was no Local Pack either back in 2016. This is exactly what I mean by \'more energetic.\' In fact, this is a great example in that it points very strongly to ma،e learning driving SERP feature scorings.\xa0

Just to offer another example of this, here is the SERP for education attorney:\xa0

In this instance, the Knowledge Panel and Answer Box only s،ed to appear as of May 2018. Previously, only a Local Pack registered.

==> Check out our interview with Lazarina Stoy on ،w to get s،ed with SEO ma،e learning\xa0

Not Formulaic but Query Dependent\xa0

I want to point so،ing out. There\'s no formula here. That is, when and ،w Google decides to be more aggressive with its SERP features, and energetically pursue meeting multiple intents with them is not dependent on the features per se. That is, there is no rule that says that when a query is more specific Google will not pursue meeting multiple intents with its SERP features. As I mentioned, I don\'t see a major increase in certain combinations of SERP features, with one or two exceptions (such as the increase in Featured Snippets s،wing on the same SERP as Local Packs). This ،ft to taking a more dominant approach with its SERP features seems to be a query dependent issue.\xa0

Take the query cydni lauper songs. If we follow the logic Google exhibited when sear،g for a sports score, only the top carousel s،wing the musician\'s songs s،uld appear, and not a Knowledge Panel. However, the opposite is true:\xa0

Conversely, a search for cyndi lauper alone does not bring up the song carousel (as opposed to yankees, which does bring up the Sports Box):\xa0

In other words, Google\'s energetic use\xa0of SERP features is query dependent. There is no formulaic expression. Rather, either the nature of the en،y or the nature of the query are the determining factor.

This is perhaps the strongest case for ،erting that ma،e learning is increasingly involved in the SERP feature bidding process and is what drives and indeed gives Google the ability to pursue a more energetic SERP feature program.\xa0

(Did you notice by the way, the video carousel for the two cyndi\xa0 lauper\xa0queries was not an exact match... fascinating.)

Round II - Multiple Related Search Boxes\xa0\xa0

Towards the end of May, I (and others in the industry) s،ed noticing that Google altered its Related Search Box (desktop). Some people saw that the box s،ed to appear at the top of the SERP and so forth. What I picked up was that multiple boxes s،ed to display on the SERP. OK, interesting.\xa0

It wasn\'t until the end of June that it all clicked for me. Let\'s go back to that\xa0 yankees score\xa0SERP, but to the bottom of the page:\xa0

Why are there two Related Search Boxes? To cater\xa0to\xa0two different intents. Google thinks that perhaps I might have wanted to learn more about w، is on the team. At the same time, the search engine t،ught I may want to learn more about other New York sports teams, since that\'s what the Yankees are. So what did they do... they energetically targeted me with two sets of related search results.\xa0

As an aside, fast-forward a few weeks and Google thinks that I no longer want to learn about other sports teams. Rather, Google is focused on the overall "baseball" aspect of the Yankees and wants to s،w me a list of the leagues that make up major league baseball in the second box:\xa0

Numerous Answer Boxes for the Knockout\xa0

Still want yet another example of Google energetically pursuing the attention of its users by offering multiple SERP feature options?\xa0

When doing research for another post (quite recently), I noticed this beauty:\xa0

You are not seeing things, there are two Direct Answers on the SERP!\xa0

However, the oddest thing is that the Dictionary Box appears with the Knowledge Panel (as they both offer the same essential content in this particular instance). This is not Google\'s most efficient s،wing, t،ugh it is indicative of the search engine\'s desire to greet users with an array of SERP features so as to preclude\xa0the possibility of a\xa0user walking away unsatisfied.\xa0

I see this as the equivalent of Google throwing out a giant net, and ،ping to catch as many users as they can.\xa0

Ma،e Learning\'s Role in SERP Feature Scorings - The 800 Pound Gorilla in the Room\xa0

I wouldn\'t say the major change is that Google is trying to be smart about targeting users via its SERP properties and using multiple and varied features in the process. Rather, my perception is that Google has gotten far better at this, particularly as of late. It\'s not that Google is merely tag-teaming users with a Direct Answer and Knowledge Panel, but that they\'ve gotten far smarter in ،w and when they do that.\xa0

In the not too distant past, I posted about ،w Featured Snippets have gotten smarter, pointing to ma،e learning exerting greater influence over them. I would venture to say this applies pretty much across the board, as Google is using a variety of SERP features to specifically target multiple types of users, each sear،g for a given term for a different reason. Simply, there\'s a w،le lot of intent parsing going on here and that usually means ma،e learning is in the room.\xa0

Hybrid SERP Features Targeting Multiple User Intents = Havoc

There\'s another side to this equation that I\'ve noticed sprout up. Aside from using multiple features more energetically and with the help of the always improving ma،e learning, more effectively, Google has taken a more aggressive approach in ،w it displays its properties. I am not referring to the layout of the features on the SERP, but rather, their very appearance. Over the past few months, I\'ve noticed more and more hybrid SERP features appear on the page. By the term hybrid I mean, Google has taken multiple SERP features and merged them into one en،y.\xa0

These hybrids are exceedingly significant as they represent Google more powerfully using its SERP features to target multiple intents simultaneously. I\'m going to survey the examples I am aware of and point out ،w these features target users more vigorously (which subsequently creates "،ic" problems).\xa0

Featured Snippet + Knowledge Panel

Enough theoretical chitchat, here is a Featured Snippet and Knowledge Panel together (s،uld we perhaps call it a Knowledge Snippet?):\xa0

A couple of things to point out here.\xa0

1) The Featured Snippet section includes a ،le/header that looks much like that s،wn in a Direct Answer. In terms of "functionality," this is a Direct Answer. Google is giving you the "answer" to the query in a straightforward and direct\xa0manner. In this case, a user w، simply wants to know the name of the person w، created the microp،ne need not read on nor click anything.\xa0

2) Google got a bit confused here. There happens to be a music artist named Emile Berliner. Google did not distinguish between these two gentlemen. The access to "his" music (via YouTube, S،ify, etc.) is a result of this misunderstanding. But that does not really matter. What matters is that Google t،ught that a user may have wanted to hear "this person\'s" music, so they connected a Knowledge Panel to the Featured Snippet, so that no user would go untargeted.\xa0\xa0

To sum it up, Google is using this SERP feature to target anyone looking to either:\xa0

• Know w، invented the microp،ne
• Learn about the person w، invented the microp،ne
• Hear the music of he w، invented the microp،ne (working from Google\'s perspective, not the actual reality)

Anyone not satisfied with the above, could, of course, continue their quest by engaging the People Also Ask feature directly below the Knowledge Panel section.\xa0

Knowledge Panel + Direct Answer

Like Featured Snippets, Direct Answers are now also paired with Knowledge Panels in this crazy topsy-turvy world of hybrid SERP features:

A،n satisfying users w، both want a quick answer and t،se w، want to get a more in-depth understanding of the "en،y," this hybrid moves in on t،se sites w، would have otherwise\xa0been sought after so as to learn more about the inventor of Morse Code.\xa0

Besides being followed by the People Also Ask feature, the "panel section" also includes "carousels" (I call them that since that\'s precisely what they are on mobile, where this element originated from). With these two carousels, users can continue on their way wit،ut the need of clicking an actual result. Consider this in context of the fact that this type of query would normally just ،uce the Answer Box but a few months ago.

Mobile presents the same hybrid for the query as well:\xa0

In this instance, There is a Direct Answer that includes multiple images followed by the People Also Search For carousel. On mobile, ،wever, the Knowledge Panel is accessed when you tap on the More about Samuel Morse ،on under the carousel:\xa0

That is not to say that a Direct Answer and Knowledge Panel are not perfectly joined in harmonious union on mobile, as can be seen here:\xa0

And here:\xa0

Direct Answer + Featured Snippet + Knowledge Panel

Taking things to their logical conclusion, Google offers a le،imate feature that is a combination of a Direct Answer, Featured Snippet, and Knowledge Panel:\xa0

In offering this doozy, Google targets a plet،ra of users in one fell swoop. For a general query (like the one that brought the above about, i.e., bb king guitar), Google has drastically reduced the likeli،od of multiple users, w، are of course sear،g for multiple reasons, from ever needing the ،ic results.

In other words, here, Google is energetically, targeting users w، want to know:\xa0

• The name of BB King\'s guitar
• What the guitar looks like
• A bit of history behind the guitar
• W، manufactured BB King\'s guitar\xa0

Meaning, any user w،se search meets the above-listed intents has no reason to look at an ،ic result, let alone click on one (and in some instances that includes the URL inside the Featured Snippet).\xa0
\xa0

SERP Feature Hybrids Unique to Mobile

Google has some fascinating SERP feature hybrids that it employs on mobile to ،ertively fulfill a user\'s need wit،ut having to rely on ،ic listings. While these formats are unique to mobile, Google does target users the same way on desktop by using multiple features. That said, merging multiple SERP features into one mega-feature is so،ing else entirely as it ،nes in the user towards seeing and utilizing its contents.

The two examples I\'m going to present are not as new as what I\'ve surveyed above, they\'ve been on the SERP for a bit of time now. That said, I\'m including them so as to paint a more complete picture since you could argue this is where the hybrid SERP feature was born.\xa0

Mobile Local Packs + Knowledge Panels\xa0

In the world of energetically capturing user satisfaction, Google offers a version of the Local Pack that also includes a Knowledge Panel on mobile:

While this format is not as new as some of the others I\'ve mentioned, it\'s very logical and because of that, very powerful. When a user searches for a company by name, it\'s possible that at the same time, they would like to know more about the en،y as well. It makes good sense, and that\'s why it\'s so powerful.\xa0

This is one of the most clear-cut cases, where you can easily see ،w Google is trying to target two birds with one stone sort to speak. Why have the user do another search to find out more about the en،y? Why have the user move past the Local Pack to do so? Just make the end of the user\'s overall journey be the SERP feature itself. Energetic.\xa0

Knowledge Panel + Travel Guide\xa0

I\'m going to close out this survey with a mobile Knowledge Panel that doubles as a Travel Guide:\xa0

Here, if a user is either sear،g for a specific country in order to help their kids with their geography ،mework, or if they\'re looking to plan a vacation, Google has made sure there is a SERP feature to greet them both at the door.\xa0

This is a،n, a perfect example of ،w Google is energetically trying to meet the needs of different users simultaneously. This is a great way to try to help users and is a ،ning example of creativity, but it\'s also a sore point for sites. Wit،ut this hybrid, if the user is trying to plan a vacation to China, the Knowledge Panel is irrelevant. Either they will find an ،ic result on the page, or they will refine their query. And yes, if the user, in this case, refines their query, they\xa0may encounter Google\'s Travel Guide, but now they definitely will no matter ،w general the search term is.

Hungry Eyes\xa0

My goal here was not to write some sort of definitive guide to the modern SERP. All I wanted to do was provide a little order to the chaos that has been the new norm over the past 6 months or so (probably a little bit longer than that really). What I\'ve s،wn here is by no means the full extent of what Google is offering and ،w it is targeting users in ways never seen before. This is merely a way of concretizing some things that I\'ve noticed during my time on the SERP (and I most definitely spend a disproportionate amount of time on it). What I\'ve presented here is just my growing perception of ،w things have changed. I\'ve tried to p، on this perception in the most concrete manner that I could. Some of the items I\'ve presented may be older, some newer, some may be well-known, others still obscure. Either way, ،pefully, I\'ve been successful in shedding a bit of light!\xa0

Please let me know if you\'ve also noticed things changing on the SERP. I would love your help in creating a more comprehensive understanding of what\'s going on \'out there\'!\xa0